Legal Opinion

United States v. Walter Cortes

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 6, 2002No. 01-50352PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TROTT, Circuit Judge.

Walter Cortes (“Cortes”) was convicted of attempted carjacking in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2119 (“carjacking statute”). Cortes requested a sentencing reduction to account for his acceptance of responsibility. The district court denied that request and sentenced Cortes to 97 months in prison.

On appeal, Cortes attacks the carjacking statute as an unconstitutional abuse of Congress’s Commerce Clause authority. Cortes appeals also his sentence insofar as it fails to account for his acceptance of responsibility. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Joining…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. United States v. Thomas Cameron KincadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. Juan Espinoza-CanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. Rhonda Anne McCoyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. Steven Michael AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. PattonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API