United States v. Juan Espinoza-Cano
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, District Judge:
Defendant Juan Espinoza-Cano appeals his conviction and sentence in the district court for illegal re-entry into the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b). This appeal requires us to address two provisions of the advisory U.S. Sentencing Guidelines (“Guidelines”). Under section 2L1.2(b)(l)(C) of the Guidelines, the district court, when calculating the Guideline range for a § 1326 conviction, must enhance the defendant’s offense level if the defendant was convicted of an aggravated felony prior to the deportation. We examine whether the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- United States v. NewsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. LapsinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Alejandro Gomez-MendezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. BeattyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.