Legal Opinion

United States v. Juan Espinoza-Cano

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 8, 2006No. 05-10339PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, District Judge:

Defendant Juan Espinoza-Cano appeals his conviction and sentence in the district court for illegal re-entry into the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b). This appeal requires us to address two provisions of the advisory U.S. Sentencing Guidelines (“Guidelines”). Under section 2L1.2(b)(l)(C) of the Guidelines, the district court, when calculating the Guideline range for a § 1326 conviction, must enhance the defendant’s offense level if the defendant was convicted of an aggravated felony prior to the deportation. We examine whether the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. United States v. NewsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. LapsinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. Alejandro Gomez-MendezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. BeattyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API