Legal Opinion
United States v. Rhonda Anne McCoy
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 20, 2003No. 01-50495PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge REINHARDT; Dissent by Judge TROTT.
OPINION
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Rhonda McCoy entered a conditional plea of guilty to possession of child pornography after photo shop employees discovered a picture of her and her daughter with their genital areas exposed. Specifically, she reserved the right to appeal on constitutional grounds the denial of her motion to dismiss the charges against her. In her appeal, McCoy challenges the section of the federal statute that prohibits the possession of child pornography made with materials that have traveled in interstate commerce,…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- United States v. Thomas Cameron KincadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. RiccardiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Jesus Aaron Cazarez-Gutierrez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Timothy ChambersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Rafael RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.