United States v. Steven Michael Adams
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TALLMAN, Circuit Judge.
In United States v. McCoy, 328 F.3d 1114 (9th Cir.2003), we entertained an “as applied” constitutional challenge to 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(4)(B) and held that Congress lacks the power under the Commerce Clause to criminalize the “simple intrastate possession of home-grown child pornography not intended for distribution or exchange.” 323 F.3d at 1122-23. Now we must answer the question left undecided in McCoy: whether 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(4)(B), on its face, is an unconstitutional exercise of congressional power. We hold that it is not.
We also hold that the definition…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- United States v. Jose Francisco Reyna-Tapia, AKA Jose ReynaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- United States v. Chance ReardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. RiccardiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. FrabizioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Morales-De-JesusCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Steve Navarro-Vargas, United States of America v. Jose Antonio Leon-JassoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.