Legal Opinion

McNeal v. Life & Casualty Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bbogdbn, I.

When a policy of insurance, properly executed, is offered by the insurer and accepted by the insured as the evidence of their contract, it must be conclusively presumed to contain all the terms of the agreement for insurance by which the parties intend to be bound. And when a formal written policy is delivered and accepted, the written policy, while it remains unaltered, constitutes the contract between the parties. Clements v. Ins. Co., 155 N. C., 57; Wilson v. Ins. Co., 155 N. C., 173; Hollingsworth v. Supreme Council, 175 N. C., 615; Guarantee Corporation v. Electric Co.; 179 N.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Clements v. Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Blackwell's Durham Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. Wilson v. Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Howell Ex Rel. Howell v. American National InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Morgan v. . Fraternal AssociationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hyde Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Dixie Leasing Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Fidelity Bankers Life Insurance v. DortchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Distributing Corp. v. . Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. State Distributing Corp. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  5. Headen v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API