Legal Opinion

Hyde Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Dixie Leasing Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 4, 1975No. 7528SC150PublishedCited by 135 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROCK, Chief Judge.

After the hearing on plaintiff’s motion for summary-judgment under Rule 56, the trial judge proceeded to make what he termed “Findings of Fact.” Summary judgment should be entered only where there is no genuine issue as to any material fact. If findings of fact are necessary to resolve an issue as to a material fact, summary judgment is improper. There is no necessity for findings of fact where facts are not at issue, and summary judgment presupposes that there are no triable issues of material fact. Although findings of fact are not necessary on a motion for summary…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gwaltney v. Provident Savings Life Assurance SocietySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. Headen v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. McNeal v. Life & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Eggimann v. Wake County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Lee v. KingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by135 opinions

  1. Homestead Supplies, Inc. v. Executive Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Collier Ex Rel. Panilla Corp. v. CollierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  3. Mosley v. National Finance Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Cieszko v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. Nytco Leasing, Inc. v. Dan-Cleve Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API