Legal Opinion · Dissent
Distributing Corp. v. . Indemnity Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided June 2, 1944PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1DissentBarnhill, J.
DEVIN and SEAWELL, JJ., join in dissenting opinion. Civil action on alleged contract of robbery and burglary insurance, and for recovery of loss sustained.
In the trial court counsel for plaintiff and for defendant filed with the court an agreed statement of facts substantially as follows:
1. Plaintiff is a corporation with its principal office and place of business located at 108 S. Blount Street, in the city of Raleigh, North Carolina.
2. Defendant, a foreign corporation, with its principal office and place of business in the city of Hartford, Connecticut, was authorized to engage, and did…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bostwick v. Mutual Life Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Gardner v. North State Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Floars v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Clements v. Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Lea v. Atlantic InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Porter v. Butte Farmers Mutual Insurance CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Western Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. BarelaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- Moore v. Adams Electric CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Eliopulos v. North River InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Mayo v. American Fire & Casualty CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.