Legal Opinion

State Distributing Corp. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 2, 1944PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.

The question for decision is this: Was the binder or contract of insurance against loss by burglary and robbery, as represented by the letter of 27 December, 1939, superseded by or merged into the formal policy covering robbery only, subsequently delivered, accepted and retained by the assured ? In the light of well recognized principles adopted and applied in decisions of this Court an affirmative answer is dictated.

These principles of law are:

1. In the field of insurance a “binder” or a “binding slip” “is merely a written memorandum of the most important terms of a preliminary contract of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bostwick v. Mutual Life Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Gardner v. North State Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. Floars v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  4. Clements v. Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. Lea v. Atlantic InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Porter v. Butte Farmers Mutual Insurance CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Western Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. BarelaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Moore v. Adams Electric CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Eliopulos v. North River InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Twelve Knotts Ltd. Partnership v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API