Headen v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
Manifestly, if the insured were not in sound health at the time of the issuance of the policy, or if within two years prior thereto, she had been attended by a physician for any serious disease, or before said date, had had any disease of the heart, liver or kidneys, she is not entitled to recover according to the express terms of the con tract of insurance. Gilmore v. Ins. Co., 199 N. C., 632, 155 S. E., 566. But it is provided by N. C. Code, 6460, that when a policy of life insurance, not to exceed $5,000 in amount, has been issued without medical examination of the insured “the policy…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bateman v. . SterrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- House v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Guilford Lumber Manufacturing Co. v. HolladaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Gilmore v. Imperial Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Holbrook v. American National InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hyde Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Dixie Leasing Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Motsinger v. PerrymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Howell v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Motsinger v. . PerrymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Fuller v. . LockhartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.