DGS Contract Service, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FUTEY, Judge.
This post-award bid protest action is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment on the administrative record. Plaintiff also requests a permanent injunction. Plaintiff maintains that the discussions held by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) with offerors in the competitive range violated the Procurement Integrity Act, 41 U.S.C. § 423 (Supp. II 1996) and several procurement regulations, and thus it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Conversely, defendant avers that its actions during the procurement process complied with the Procurement…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Mantech Telecommunications & Information Systems Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Sierra Nevada Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Orion International Technologies v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Systems Application & Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Sheridan Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.