Legal Opinion

DGS Contract Service, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 8, 1999No. 98-891CPublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FUTEY, Judge.

This post-award bid protest action is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment on the administrative record. Plaintiff also requests a permanent injunction. Plaintiff maintains that the discussions held by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) with offerors in the competitive range violated the Procurement Integrity Act, 41 U.S.C. § 423 (Supp. II 1996) and several procurement regulations, and thus it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Conversely, defendant avers that its actions during the procurement process complied with the Procurement…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Mantech Telecommunications & Information Systems Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  2. Sierra Nevada Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  3. Orion International Technologies v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  4. Systems Application & Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  5. Sheridan Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API