Legal Opinion
Sheridan Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 1, 2010No. 10-547CPublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WHEELER, Judge.
In this bid protest, Plaintiff Sheridan Corporation (“Sheridan”) challenges the reasonableness and legality of a procuring agency’s corrective action to resolicit proposals where no apparent defect in the initial proposals exists. Following a competitive solicitation, the United States Property and Fiscal Office of Maine, National Guard Bureau (the “agency”) awarded a contract to Sheridan on May 12, 2010 for the construction of a KC-135 aircraft maintenance hangar in Bangor, Maine. The agency based its award decision solely on the initial proposals received,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Sierra Nevada Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- CBY Design Builders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Systems Application & Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Square One Armoring Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Vanguard Recovery Assistance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.