Carr-Gottstein Properties v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before MOORE, C.J., and RABINOWITZ, MATTHEWS, COMPTON and EASTAUGH, JJ. PER CURIAM.
We have determined that none of the points raised by appellant are meritorious. We agree with the decisions entered in this ease by the Honorable Larry R. Weeks, superior court judge. 1 The judgment is AFFIRMED.
APPENDIX A
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT JUNEAU
Case No. 3AN-94-4995 Cl
ORDER AFFIRMING DECISION OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Introduction
This case comes before the court on Appellant Carr-Gottstein’s (CG’s) appeal of the…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Book v. State Office Building CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
- Texas Public Building Authority v. MattoxTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Tobeluk Ex Rel. Tobeluk v. LindAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- State Ex Rel. Thomson v. GiesselWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Laverty v. Alaska RR Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Eric Forrer v. State of Alaska and Lucinda MahoneyAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
- Alaska Association of Naturopathic Physicians v. State, Division of Corporations, Business & Professional LicensingAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Lonegan v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- Stalnaker v. WilliamsAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.