Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Thomson v. Giessel
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided October 11, 1955PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSteinle, J.
By the demurrer the respondent challenges the constitutionality of ch. 144, Laws of 1955, and the validity of the action taken or proposed thereunder by the state agencies as asserted in the complaint. The act amended sec. 20.41 (5); repealed and re-created secs. 20.07 (9m), 20.38 (8) and (12) (a), 36.06 (6), and 37.02 (3), Stats. It created sec. 14.89. The purpose of the act is to provide means whereby the state building commission, University Board of Regents, and the Board of Regents of the State Colleges may construct and finance buildings for use of the state. The principal parts of the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Tranter v. Alleghency County Co. AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Cincinnati v. VesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- City of Cincinnati v. Vester. Same v. Richards Same v. ReakirtSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- State ex rel. Attorney General v. DonaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
- State ex rel. Wisconsin Development Authority v. DammannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hammermill Paper Co. v. La PlanteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Book v. State Office Building CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
- State Ex Rel. Warren v. NusbaumWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- In Re the Oklahoma Capitol Improvement AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Warren v. ReuterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.