Nyulassy v. Lockheed Martin Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WALSH, J.
Our Supreme Court has upheld employment agreements that require the employee to arbitrate disputes, so long as the arbitration clause does not impair the employee’s statutory rights and is not unconscionable. (See Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83 [99 Cal.Rptr.2d 745, 6 P.3d 669] (Armendariz).) We are called upon here to examine whether a mandatory employment arbitration agreement—executed by the employee in connection with the settlement of a previous dispute with the employer’s predecessor after advice from the employee’s…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
- Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Clinton Cole v. Burns International Security ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Connie A. Nagrampa v. Mailcoups, Inc. The American Arbitration AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Pokorny v. Quixtar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Abraham Bielski v. Coinbase, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Bruni v. DidionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Roman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.