Legal Opinion

Roman v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 13, 2009No. B209855PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PERLUSS, P. J.

An application for employment contains an arbitration clause providing, “I agree, in the event I am hired by the company, that all disputes and claims that might arise out of my employment with the company will be submitted to binding arbitration.” Is the arbitration agreement one-sided, obligating the applicant-employee (if she is hired) to arbitrate her claims without imposing a reciprocal requirement on the employer in connection with its claims against the employee?

In her petition for writ of mandate challenging the trial court’s order compelling arbitration of her…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Discover Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. In Re Marriage of ArceneauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Lakin v. Watkins Associated IndustriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. MorenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Sakkab v. Luxottica Retail North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. Ajamian v. Cantorco2e. L.P.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Serafin v. Balco Properties Ltd., LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Dotson v. Amgen, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API