Legal Opinion
Grisham v. Philip Morris U.S.A.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 28, 2005No. 03-55780, 03-56018PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
We certify to the California Supreme Court the questions set forth in Part II of this order. The answers to the certified questions depend upon California law, and the answers may be determinative of the outcome of the present appeals. We find no clear controlling precedent in the decisions of the California Supreme Court. The answers provided by the California Supreme Court to the certified questions will be followed by this court.
All further proceedings in these cases are stayed pending final action by the California Supreme Court, and these cases are withdrawn from submission until…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Wyatt v. Union Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
- Seeger v. OdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Myers v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- Grisham v. Philip Morris U.S.A., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
- Arturet-Vélez v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- International Society for Krishna Consciousness of California Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Pooshs v. Phillip Morris USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Durand v. United States CustomsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.