Legal Opinion

Pooshs v. Phillip Morris USA, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 1, 2009No. 08-16338PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER CERTIFYING THE QUESTION TO THE STATE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA

2Per curiam

ORDER

We certify to the California Supreme Court the questions set forth in Part II of this order. The answer to the certified questions depend upon California law, and the answers are determinative to the outcome of the present appeal. We find no clear controlling precedent in the decisions of the California Supreme Court. The answer provided by the California Supreme Court to the certified questions will be followed by this court.

All further proceedings in this case are stayed pending final action by the California Supreme…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Davies v. KrasnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Grisham v. Philip Morris U.S.A., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Lauro ACEVES, Jamie Aceves, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Cross-Appellees, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Martinez-Ferrer v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Miller v. Lakeside Village Condominium Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pooshs v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Alexia Herrera v. Zumiez, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API