Legal Opinion

Garcia v. County of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 14, 1986No. B013463PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LUKE, J. *

Martin Raymond Garcia (appellant) appeals from an order granting a motion by the County of Los Angeles and Sheriff Peter J. Pitchess (respondents) for a new trial.

Appellant contends that: (1) it was reversible error for the trial court to grant resporfdents’ motion for a new trial because of the absence of a witness where respondents, the proponents of the witness, failed to ask for a continuance; (2) no irregularity occurred on which to base the order granting a new trial since respondents failed to subpoena the absent witness, and failed to advise the trial court of his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jiminez v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Pobor v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Kauffman v. De MutiisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Marcucci v. VowinckelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Osborne v. Cal-Am Financial Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. AultCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. People v. AultCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Mosesian v. Pennwalt Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Crawford v. Weather Shield Mfg., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. People v. AultCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API