Legal Opinion

Norton v. Norton

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1924No. 18275PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

Throughout this opinion the plaintiff in error will be called the wife, and the defendant in error will be called the husband.

The Court of Appeals reversed the order of the court of common pleas granting temporary alimony to the wife upon three grounds:

First. That the trial court committed error prejudicial to the defendant in error in refusing to grant a continuance.

Second. That the trial court erred in granting temporary alimony, for the reason that there was no competent evidence to sustain the allowance.

Third. Upon the ground that the court of common pleas erred in overruling the motion…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Collins v. . CollinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Fowler v. FowlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Peyre v. PeyreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Buck v. McCabeOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  2. City of Akron v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Sinclair v. SinclairOhio Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. Leiberg, Admx. v. VitangeliOhio Court of Appeals · 1942
  5. H.R. v. P.J.E.Ohio Supreme Court · 2023

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API