Peyre v. Peyre
California Supreme Court
Appeal from, a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C. C.
Plaintiff and defendant were husband and wife. Plaintiff commenced an action for divorce on the ground of defendant’s habitual intemperance. Defendant by her answer denied the charge made against her, and, as a separate defense, alleged that while she was sick, plaintiff, with intent to make her worse, compelled her to drink some mixture concocted by him, and that after she had taken it she became so ill that she was unable to leave her bed; “and while she was ill the plaintiff caused her to be removed to a hospital for inebriates, and had her imprisoned therein without her…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Eidenmuller v. EidenmullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Hagle v. HagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Hagle v. HagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Hansen v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by24 opinions
- Webber v. WebberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Wallace v. Casper Adjustment ServiceWyoming Supreme Court · 1972
- Hutchinson v. DowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Lampson v. LampsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.