Legal Opinion
State v. Boulier
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 11, 1998No. AC 16910PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*703 Opinion
KULAWIZ, J.
The defendant, Kirk A. Boulier, appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to correct his presentence investigation report (report). He claims that the trial court improperly denied the motion for lack of jurisdiction because judgment had entered. We affirm the denial of the defendant’s motion, although the preferred procedure would be to dismiss the defendant’s motion.
The defendant was charged by long form information with one count of attempt to commit assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-49 and 53a-59, one count of kidnapping in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. NardiniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. CareySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. VaughanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
- Cichy v. KostykSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- State v. PallottiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. ReidSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. WebbConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. LawrenceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. Falcon, No. Cr97-0029972s (Jan. 30, 2003)Connecticut Superior Court · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.