Legal Opinion
Bradley v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided June 26, 1992No. Nos. 617-85 C, 394-86, 477-86, 90-101, 90-629 and 91-1645PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
TURNER, Judge.
Plaintiffs in these six consolidated cases are journeymen plate printers (and their local union) currently or formerly employed by the Bureau of Engraving and Printing (“BEP”), an agency within the Department of the Treasury.1 They challenge a pay determination made by the appropriate Treasury official on July 28, 1989, which rejected a requested increase in their wage rates. Plaintiffs contend that the determination constituted an unlawful, arbitrary and capricious exercise of the pay-fixing authority established by 5 U.S.C. § 5349(a). Plaintiffs seek increased…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Graphicdata, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Cubic Applications, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- East West, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- State of North Carolina Business Enterprises Program v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- IMCO, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.