Legal Opinion
IMCO, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 28, 1995No. 94-782CPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This is an action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(3) (1988) for declaratory and injunctive relief. Plaintiff seeks to have the court overturn its debarment and reinstate a solicitation from which it was excluded. The matter is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for judgment under RCFC 56.1. Oral argument was held April 20, 1995. After considering the Debarment Administrative Record (“Administrative Record” or “DAR”) and the parties’ arguments, the court concludes that the defendant’s motion should be granted and the plaintiff’s motion should be…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Graphicdata, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Cubic Applications, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Stapp Towing Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
- CRC Marine Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Global Computer Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.