Legal Opinion
East West, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 7, 2011No. 11-455CPublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WOLSKI, Judge.
Before the Court are plaintiffs motion to supplement the administrative record with a declaration from one of its officers, and defendant’s motion to strike all references to this declaration in plaintiffs brief on the merits. For the reasons that follow, the motion to supplement is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART and the motion to strike is DENIED.
In this pre-award bid protest, East West, Inc. protests its exclusion from the competitive range by the Department of Health and Human Services’ National Institutes of Health (“NIH” or “the agency”), in a procurement for…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Axiom Resource Management, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- CBY Design Builders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Raytheon Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Ncl Logistics Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Palantir Usg, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Communication Construction Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.