Legal Opinion

Rusher v. Bunker

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 8, 1989No. CV 85-206; CA A46715PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Plaintiffs brought this action for foreclosure of a mortgage on real property owned by defendants Bunker. They appeal from the judgment of foreclosure, arguing that their mortgage was entitled to priority over a trust deed held by Benjamin Franklin Federal Savings & Loan Association (Benjamin Franklin).

On July 31, 1979, the Bunkers gave plaintiffs three promissory notes, secured by a pledge of stock and by a real property mortgage. The mortgage, which was captioned “Second Mortgage,” applied to several lots in two tracts. Only one of those lots, lot 3, is involved in this appeal. Although the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. High v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Pearce v. BuellOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Holzmeyer v. Van DorenOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Chase v. McKenzieOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. CravenOregon Supreme Court · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bank of America, NA v. Prestance Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Bank of America v. Prestance Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Houston v. Bank of America Federal Savings BankNevada Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Kim v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Dimeo v. GesikCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API