Legal Opinion

Pearce v. Buell

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1892PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Douglas county: M. L. Pipes, Judge. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

This is a suit, on the ground of fraud and mistake, to set aside a conveyance made by the defendant Buell and wife to Truman and Francis Hyde, who are joined as plaintiffs with John Pearce, and to reinstate a mortgage given by Buell and wife to Pearce prior to the date of the conveyance from Buell to the Hydes.

The facts material for the decision of the case are these: On May 3, 1889, the defendant Buell and wife executed to plaintiff Pearce a mortgage upon the premises described in the complaint to secure the payment of an indebtedness of $1,129 with interest at the rate of eight per cent per…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Geib v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  2. Bruse v. NelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
  3. Vannice v. BergenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  4. Cobb v. DyerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1879
  5. Barnes v. CamackNew York Supreme Court · 1847

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Title Guarantee Co. v. WrennOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Shaffer v. McCloskeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Institute Building & Loan Ass'n v. EdwardsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1913
  4. Lomas & Nettleton Co. v. IsacsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  5. Security National Bank & Trust Co. of Norman v. Dentsply Professional PlanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API