Legal Opinion

Kim v. Lee

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 2001No. 70347-7PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

31 P.3d 665 (2001)

Hu Hyun KIM, Petitioner.

v.

Stanley LEE and Jane Doe Lee, Defendants,

Yakima County Title Company d/b/a Yakima Title & Escrow, Respondent.

No. 70347-7.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued May 22, 2001.

Decided September 20, 2001.

Edwards, Sieh, Smith & Goodfriend, Howard Mark Goodfriend, Seattle, Chae & Associates, Nancy McKenney Allo, Kent, for Petitioner.

Michael Frederick Shinn, Yakima, for Respondent.

IRELAND, J.

This is a discretionary review of a Court of Appeals' decision which granted Yakima Title & Escrow Company first lienholder position, through the doctrine of…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Alexander; Concurrence · Madsen.

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Millay v. CamWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Wilkins, Neely & Jones v. GibsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Continental Lighting & Contracting, Inc. v. Premier Grading & Utilities, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  2. Lamb Excavation, Inc. v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  3. Houston v. Bank of America Federal Savings BankNevada Supreme Court · 2003
  4. First Commonwealth Bank v. HellerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. BNC Mortgage, Inc. v. Tax Pros, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API