Dimeo v. Gesik
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.
This is the second time this case has been before us. In Dimeo v. Gesik, 164 Or App 567, 993 P2d 183 (1999), we reversed the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff Dimeo and against defendant Western Bank (the bank). On remand, plaintiff prevailed at trial, and the bank does not challenge that result. After trial, however, the trial court entered a supplemental judgment 1 awarding attorney fees to plaintiff under ORS 20.105(1) on the ground that the bank had asserted a counterclaim for which it had no objectively reasonable basis. 2 The bank appeals from that judgment,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Pearce v. BuellOregon Supreme Court · 1892
- Mantia v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Secor Investments, LLC v. AndereggCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Williams v. SALEM WOMEN'S CLINICCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Patton v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2005
- Dimeo v. GesikCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Patton v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2005
- Olson v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.