Legal Opinion

Bregman v. Edbro Realty Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunne, J.

The defendant corporation seeks to vacate a notice of examination before trial pursuant to section 289 of the Civil Practice Act on three grounds: First, that the examination is sought to be held before an office associate or employee of plaintiff’s attorney; second, that the plaintiff seeks to examine an elevator operator in the employ of the defendant, who, it is claimed, is not a representative of the corporation and does not fall within the class of persons subject to examination under the section in question, and, further, that no special reason is shown for taking his testimony; third,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Enequist v. Brooklyn City RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  2. Swift v. General Baking Co.New York Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Masciarelli v. Delaware & Hudson RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Bernstein v. N. V. Nederlandsche-Amerikaansche Stoomvaart-MaatschappijDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
  3. Loring v. Dime Savings Bank of BrooklynAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API