Legal Opinion

Swift v. General Baking Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1927PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodenbeck, J.

This is an application to examine the defendants as to the circumstances of the accident in which the plaintiff was injured. It is claimed that she is not entitled to a general examination and that the man who was driving the car for the defendant corporation is not a “ managing ” employee and so not subject to examination, except upon the conditions attaching to a witness. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 289.)

When the civil procedure was last being generally revised, there was an active discussion as to the simplification of the practice relating to examinations before trial. Some members of the bar…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Glenney v. . StedwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Herbage v. . City of UticaNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Cherbuliez v. ParsonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  4. Pierce v. MorrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  5. Hartog & Beinhauer Candy Co. v. Richmond Cedar WorksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tremblay v. LyonNew York Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Bregman v. Edbro Realty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Caswell v. United Air LinesNew York Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Davidson v. NewmanNew York Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API