Legal Opinion

Bernstein v. N. V. Nederlandsche-Amerikaansche Stoomvaart-Maatschappij

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 14, 1953PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOCK, District Judge.

Under date of July 20, 1953, I filed an opinion in this case, 15 F.R.D. 32, in which I denied the right of third-party defendant Chemical Bank to examine third-party plaintiff Holland-Ameriea Line through one Van Der Vorm on the ground that corporate parties could not be examined through their directors and Van Der Vorm’s position approximated that of a director of an American corporation.

Chemical Bank has now moved, on additional papers, for a determination that Holland-Ameriea may be examined through Van Der Vorm. It is urged upon me that Van Der Vorm’s positions as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Campbell v. General Motors Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
  2. Bregman v. Edbro Realty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Fulton v. National Aniline & Chemical Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  4. Bernstein v. N. V. Nederlandsche-Amerikaansche Stoomvaart-MaatschappijDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Krauss v. Erie R. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
  2. Rubin v. General Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  3. Independent Productions Corp v. Loew's, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
  4. Fay v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1958
  5. Newark Insurance v. SartainDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API