Bernstein v. N. V. Nederlandsche-Amerikaansche Stoomvaart-Maatschappij
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DIMOCK, District Judge.
Under date of July 20, 1953, I filed an opinion in this case, 15 F.R.D. 32, in which I denied the right of third-party defendant Chemical Bank to examine third-party plaintiff Holland-Ameriea Line through one Van Der Vorm on the ground that corporate parties could not be examined through their directors and Van Der Vorm’s position approximated that of a director of an American corporation.
Chemical Bank has now moved, on additional papers, for a determination that Holland-Ameriea may be examined through Van Der Vorm. It is urged upon me that Van Der Vorm’s positions as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Campbell v. General Motors Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Bregman v. Edbro Realty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1929
- Fulton v. National Aniline & Chemical Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Bernstein v. N. V. Nederlandsche-Amerikaansche Stoomvaart-MaatschappijDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
3Cited by10 opinions
- Krauss v. Erie R. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- Rubin v. General Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Independent Productions Corp v. Loew's, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Fay v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1958
- Newark Insurance v. SartainDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.