Enequist v. Brooklyn City Railroad
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to vacate notice of examination denied. The subjects upon which the examination is sought, as set forth in subdivisions “ 2,” “ 3 ” and “ 4 ” of the notice of examination, in our opinion, are material and necessary for the proper prosecution of plaintiff’s action, and should, therefore, be allowed. Subdivision “ 1 ” of the notice of examination, having reference to matters of proof the burden of which is upon defendant, in a case of this kind, should be stricken out. The motorman *731and conductor of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Friedman v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Pierce v. MorrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- West v. Coney Island & Brooklyn RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1926
- Cameron v. Rochester & Syracuse RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by5 opinions
- Masciarelli v. Delaware & Hudson RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1942
- Bregman v. Edbro Realty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1929
- Ida v. Borden's Farm Products Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Kaminsky v. John F. Trommer, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Loring v. Dime Savings Bank of BrooklynAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936