Legal Opinion
Masciarelli v. Delaware & Hudson Railroad
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 27, 1942PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeyo, J.
These two actions were brought to recover damages arising out of a railroad crossing accident. The jury has returned verdicts of no cause of action in each instance. The plaintiffs now seek a new trial for error alleged to have been committed by the trial court in permitting the defendants to read into the record a certain deposition and in refusing to allow evidence of other accidents at the same crossing to be introduced.
■ Sometime prior to the trial, at the instance of the plaintiffs and over the objections of the defendants, an order was granted directing an examination before trial of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Baulec v. . New York Harlem R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
- McGowan v. EastmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- In re the Estate of GreenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
- Berdell v. . BerdellNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Jacobs v. Mexican Sugar Refining Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kaplan v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
- Kaplan v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
- Dworkow v. BachrackNew York Supreme Court · 1948
- Gottfried v. GottfriedNew York Supreme Court · 1950
- Mravlja v. HokeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.