Legal Opinion

Law v. Long

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1873PublishedCited by 22 opinions

APPEAL from the Shelby Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBuskirk, J.

—This was an action by the appellees, as husband and wife, against the appellants, to obtain an assignment of dower to the female plaintiff, in certain described real estate.

The complaint was in two paragraphs. The substantial averments in the first paragraph were as follows:

“That on the 6th day of January,' 1848, the plaintiff Nancy was married to Abraham Hill; that her said husband wrongfully obtained the possession of her money and property, and-without her consent invested the same in the purchase of the real estate in controversy; that by mistake and without her consent, the deed was…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Bool v. MixNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  2. Potter v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Sanford v. McLeanNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  4. Kline v. BeebeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1827
  5. Russell's heirs v. Marks' heirsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1860

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Sims v. EverhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Hull v. LouthIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Scranton v. StewartIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Musselman v. CravensIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Nichol v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API