Legal Opinion

Musselman v. Cravens

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1874PublishedCited by 35 opinions

From the Cass Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtBuskirk, J.

The substituted complaint was as follows:

“ Henry Cravens, Charles E. Hawthorn, James Hodge, James Hammond, William W. Curry, and John N. Converse v. John T. Musselman. For complaint herein, the plaintiffs say that on the 6th day of September, 1869, they were about to organize an institution of learning, and locate the same at the city of Logansport; that to raise the necessary sum to endow the same, they lacked five thousand dollars. Whereupon the defendant, John T. Musselman, made, executed, and delivered to them his certain note, or contract, a copy of which is herewith filed, marked…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Somers v. PumphreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Crouse v. HolmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Grant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1822
  4. Fetrow v. WisemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Heavenridge v. MondyIndiana Supreme Court · 1870

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Landwerlen v. WheelerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Hull v. LouthIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Teegarden v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Fay v. BurdittIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Nichol v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API