Legal Opinion
Albert & Harlow, Inc. v. Fitzgerald
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 25, 1964No. 40214PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRWIN, Justice.
Albert & Harlow, Inc., hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, commenced this action against Robert W. Fitzgerald, to recover a money judgment based on a written contract for the rental of a cat-tractor. The matter was tried to the court and judgment was rendered for the defendant. Plaintiff appeals from the order overruling its motion for a new trial.
PLEADINGS
Plaintiff alleged, inter alia, that it and defendant entered into a written rental lease contract under the terms of which defendant agreed to rent from plaintiff a cat-tractor for a minimum period of three months for a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stafford v. McDougalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Lone Star Gas Company v. OakmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Oklahoma Company v. O'NEILSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Pray v. Kidd Williams Drilling CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Quincy Johnston, Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- TORRES v. SEABOARD FOODS, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- Gatz v. Southwest Bank of OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- M.J. Lee Construction Co. v. Oklahoma Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Weston v. Acme Tool, IncorporatedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Thompson v. Estate of H. H. CoffieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.