Legal Opinion

Oklahoma Company v. O'NEIL

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 2, 1958No. 38178PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

This case arises out of the acquisition of ownership of fractional interests in the working interest of three oil and gas leases, known respectively as the Kane lease, the Kane B-1 lease, and the Longbone lease, the last named being an Indian departmental lease. These three leases combined «cover the entire Northeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 25 North, Range 13 East, Washington County, Oklahoma. There is also involved a controversy concerning the development and operation of said leases after the title to and ownership thereof was acquired. by the parties here involved. Plaintiff below,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Myers v. ChamnessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Feagin v. ChampionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  3. Dawson v. SearsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Clayton v. PaulSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  5. Enola Oil Company v. BogieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Company v. O'NEILSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  2. Albert & Harlow, Inc. v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  3. Dewberry v. Yellow Manufacturing Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  4. Hill v. FieldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
  5. Oklahoma Company v. O'NEILSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API