Quincy Johnston, Inc. v. Wilson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Per curiam
The parties to this action appear here in the same order as in the trial court and we shall continue to refer to them by their trial court designation.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover on an open account. Defendant answered by admitting the correctness of the account pleaded by plaintiff but alleging a set-off more than sufficient to satisfy the debt. Defendant also cross-petitioned for damages arising out of the failure of plaintiff to fulfill a contractual obligation. From a judgment on a jury verdict in defendant’s favor for damages, plaintiff appeals.
In his answer, after admitting…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Globe Refining Co. v. Landa Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Eason Oil Co. v. WhitesideSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Moore v. EmersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Alton Railroad Co. v. Oklahoma Furn. Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf Railroad v. JacobsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Florafax International Inc. v. GTE Market Resources, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Davon Drilling Company v. GinderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Beck v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Albert & Harlow, Inc. v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Beck v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.