Legal Opinion

Pray v. Kidd Williams Drilling Corporation

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 8, 1960No. 37979PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Justice.

This is an appeal by defendant, Max Pray, from judgment on directed verdict for plaintiff, Kidd Williams Drilling Corporation, in the amount of $24,128.07, as balance due under terms of a certain written contract. In accordance with said contract, plaintiff drilled a well on a leasehold in Garvin County, Oklahoma, owned by defendant (⅜⅜hs), Kenneth Ellison (⅛⅛), and Redlands Oil Company (%ths). The contract recited that defendant was to be the operator of the well when completed, and defendant was the only one of the lease owners who was a party to or who signed the contract.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gamble v. RileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Coston v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  3. Colonial Jewelry Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Baker v. Traders & General Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  5. Warren v. PulleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cassia Creek Reservoir Co. v. HarperIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Albert & Harlow, Inc. v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  3. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. MartinCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
  4. Mid-America Corporation v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  5. Federal National Bank & Trust Co. of Shawnee v. Shanon Drilling, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API