State v. Campbell
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARVEY A. HOLTAN, Judge. *
Oja Campbell, Jr. challenges the district court’s refusal to suppress evidence obtained during a search of his home. The district court concluded that law enforcement officers properly searched for and seized contraband observed first in plain view and later moved. Because the district court did not err, we affirm.
FACTS
Oja Campbell, Jr. called police after shots were fired into his home. Campbell invited the responding officer into his home to secure it and to investigate the incident. The first concern of the officer was Campbell’s safety and he went through…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. OthoudtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Middleton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. BunceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Middleton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999