Legal Opinion

Middleton v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1999No. 85S02-9812-CR-764Published

1Opinion of the Court

714 N.E.2d 1099 (1999)

Matthew MIDDLETON, Appellant (Defendant Below),

v.

STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff Below).

No. 85S02-9812-CR-764.

Supreme Court of Indiana.

June 29, 1999.

Katharine C. Liell, Teresa D. Harper, Bloomington, Indiana, Attorneys for Appellant.

Jeffrey A. Modisett, Attorney General of Indiana, James D. Dimitri, Deputy Attorney General, Indianapolis, Indiana, Attorneys for Appellee.

ON PETITION TO TRANSFER

BOEHM, Justice.

This case involves the "plain view" doctrine: if a police officer is properly in the residence of another and sees items that may be seized under the doctrine…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API