State v. Bunce
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
On appeal from a conviction for first-degree controlled substance offense (possession of methamphetamine), appellant argues (1) that police, who appeared at appellant’s residence to check on his welfare, did not obtain voluntary consent to search the house; (2) that police, who suspected appellant of using methamphetamine, misrepresented their purpose when they told him they were looking for a shotgun out of concern that he was suicidal; and (3) that police exceeded the scope of appellant’s consent when they lifted a pillow knowing it could not conceal a shotgun.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Murray v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Walter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Anthony J. DichiarinteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. DezsoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. CraigCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. RasmussenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008