Legal Opinion

Middleton v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1999No. 85S02-9812-CR-764PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION TO TRANSFER

BOEHM, Justice.

This case involves the “plain view” doctrine: if a police officer is properly in the residence of another and sees items that may be seized under the doctrine but leaves the home without them, may the officer then return to seize the items without first obtaining a search warrant? We conclude that, in the absence of exigent circumstances or some other exception to the warrant requirement, such a seizure is prohibited by the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Factual and Procedural Background

On June 4, 1997, realtor Pat Rowans showed a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Bilida v. McCleodCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  2. Logan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Edwards v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Edwards v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Davis v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API