Legal Opinion
Gramling v. MEMORIAL BLOOD CENTERS
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 22, 1999No. C2-99-322PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AMUNDSON, Judge.
Alleging paternity tests conducted in 1979 erroneously excluded her father, appellant sued respondents St. Louis County, the doctor responsible for the tests, and the testing facility. After the claims against the doctor and the testing facility were resolved, the district court granted the county’s summary judgment motion on appellant’s remaining claim of legal malpractice by the county for its negligent failure to establish her paternity in 1979. On appeal, appellant argues the district court erred in granting the county summary judgment alleging she had an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Togstad v. Vesely, Otto, Miller & KeefeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Admiral Merchants Motor Freight, Inc. v. O'Connor & HannanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bremer Business Finance Corp. v. Dorsey & Whitney LLP (In Re SRC Holding Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2006
- Bremer Business Finance Corp. v. Whitney (In Re SRC Holding Corp.)District Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
- McIntosh County Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLPCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Patrick T. Manion v. Stephen E. NaginCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Azarax, Inc. v. Wireless Communications Venture LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.