McIntosh County Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIS, Judge:
Appellants challenge the district court’s grant of summary judgment to respondent on appellants’ legal-malpractice, breaeh-of-contract, and negligent-misrepresentation claims. We conclude that the district court appropriately granted summary judgment to respondent on appellants’ negligent-misrepresentation claim. The district court also correctly found that there are no genuine issues of material fact as to whether appellants have standing to sue respondent for legal malpractice under a contract-assignment or a tort theory. But because genuine issues of material fact…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Leonard v. Dorsey & Whitney LLPCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- McIntosh County Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLPSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Bremer Business Finance Corp. v. Whitney (In Re SRC Holding Corp.)District Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
- State of Minnesota v. Aloeng Kelly Vang, A14-1574Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Azarax, Inc. v. Wireless Communications Venture LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.