Legal Opinion
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Smith
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided October 18, 1983No. SC 29583PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
In this attorney discipline proceeding the accused is charged with violating DR 7-110(B), which prohibits ex parte contact by a lawyer and provides as follows:
“(B) In an adversary proceeding, a lawyer shall not communicate, or cause another to communicate, as to the merits of the cause with a judge or an official before whom the proceeding is pending, except:
“(1) In the course of official proceedings in the cause.
“(2) In writing if he promptly delivers a copy of the writing to opposing counsel or to the adverse party if he is not represented by a lawyer.
“(3) Orally upon adequate notice to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re FriedmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
- Crow v. AbrahamOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Haney v. Neace-Stark Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1923
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BurrowsOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BellOregon Supreme Court · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DuggerOregon Supreme Court · 2002
- In re ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MerkelOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- In Re LeuenbergerOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GillisOregon Supreme Court · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.