Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Bell

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1982No. SC 28670PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue is the appropriate sanction for a violation of DR 7-110(B), which forbids a lawyer to communicate as to the merits of a case with a judge before whom the case is pending except in circumstances not pertinent to the circumstances of this case.

The following statement of facts is drawn from the accused’s brief insofar as that statement has been accepted by the Oregon State Bar in its brief. Facts not drawn from the accused’s brief are those which we find from our own review of the record.

Raymond Silbernagel was the purchaser at sheriffs sale of certain real property. Margaret Scott was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BoivinOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GreeneOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EnglishOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Silbernagel v. GoinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  5. In Re Complaint of BarnesOregon Supreme Court · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re a Member of State Bar of Arizona RileyArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. In re ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. In Re LeuenbergerOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  5. In Re a Member of State Bar of Arizona RileyArizona Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API