Legal Opinion
State v. Siner
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided June 5, 2003No. 1 CA-CR-01-1055PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GEMMILL, Judge.
¶ 1 Pamela Jean Siner appeals her conviction for drive-by shooting. Because we find instructional error, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. We hold that Arizona’s doctrine of transferred intent does not apply to the offense of drive-by shooting because drive-by shooting does not require intentionally causing a particular result as an element of the offense.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶2 Siner was the driver of a car from which shots were fired by a passenger in the direction of a pickup truck and home in Bullhead City, Arizona, between 11:00 p.m. and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. Amaya-RuizArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. HenleyArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. Rodriguez-GonzalesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- State v. HensleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. OntiverosCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- State v. TsinnijinnieCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- State v. TyszkiewiczCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- State v. BotkinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.