Legal Opinion
State v. Tyszkiewicz
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 23, 2005No. 2 CA-CR 2003-0267PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ECKERSTROM, J.
¶ 1 Appellant Stanley Thomas Tyszkiewicz was convicted after a jury trial of two counts of aggravated driving under the influence of an intoxicant (DUI), sentenced to a four-month term of imprisonment, and placed on probation for concurrent, five-year terms. He claims that the trial court erred by admitting his breath test results without satisfying the foundational requirements set forth in former A.R.S. § 28-695(A)(4) 1 and that the state did not present sufficient evidence of his time of driving to support his conviction under former A.R.S. § 28-692(A)(1) and (2). See…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. TarangoArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- State v. RosengrenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- State of Arizona v. Michael Manuel DixonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007