Legal Opinion

State v. Tsinnijinnie

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 11, 2003No. 1 CA-CR 02-0958PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GEMMILL, Judge.

¶ 1 Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 13-604.01 (2001) requires that the defendant in this case be sentenced to consecutive sentences for his convictions for sexual assault and molestation of a child.

¶2 Michael Tsinnijinnie was convicted of one count of sexual assault and two counts of molestation of a child, all “dangerous crimes against children” under A.R.S. § 13-604.01. Tsinnijinnie appeals from his convictions and sentences. The State cross-appeals the trial court’s sentencing of Tsinnijinnie to concurrent sentences for Count 1, sexual assault, and Count…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Janson v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  3. In the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-5209 & No. JS-4963Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  4. Olson v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Abbott v. City of TempeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. Shawnte Shuree JonesArizona Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Speros v. YuCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  3. Romaine v. ShinnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API