State v. Tsinnijinnie
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GEMMILL, Judge.
¶ 1 Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 13-604.01 (2001) requires that the defendant in this case be sentenced to consecutive sentences for his convictions for sexual assault and molestation of a child.
¶2 Michael Tsinnijinnie was convicted of one count of sexual assault and two counts of molestation of a child, all “dangerous crimes against children” under A.R.S. § 13-604.01. Tsinnijinnie appeals from his convictions and sentences. The State cross-appeals the trial court’s sentencing of Tsinnijinnie to concurrent sentences for Count 1, sexual assault, and Count…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Janson v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- In the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-5209 & No. JS-4963Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Olson v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1930
- Abbott v. City of TempeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Shawnte Shuree JonesArizona Supreme Court · 2014
- Speros v. YuCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Romaine v. ShinnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020